Her appeal includes
Ana Rosenda Mancio appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found her guilty of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) for the April 28, 2015 shooting of Miguel Romero. The jury also found true the allegation Mancio was a principal armed with a firearm in the commission of the offense (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). On appeal, Mancio contends the People failed to present substantial evidence Mancio either personally killed Romero or aided and abetted in his killing. Mancio also argues her attorney’s failure to object to the admission of evidence she possessed firearms not used in the killing constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.
In supplemental briefing, Mancio contends the trial court violated her right to due process and equal protection by failing to consider her ability to pay before imposing court assessments and restitution fines, relying on this court’s opinion in People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 (Dueñas). She also argues imposition of the fines and assessments without an ability-to-pay hearing violated the excessive fines clause of the Eighth Amendment.
She was sentenced to 26 years to life.
You can write to her at:
Ana Mancio WG0913
Central California Women's Facility
P.O. Box 1508
Chowchilla, CA 93610
Find Other Inmates
Comments
Post a Comment